Craig Stuntz has a clarification on the C4P. John Kaster posted in the newsgroups that there would be some invited speakers who would be compensated similar to normal.
While that seems like a good idea to keep the "choice" speakers in attendance while saving money on the less choice ones, it seems like risky business to have speakers who must provide their own way and don't have a vested interest in appearing. A lot can happen in the time from when a session is accepted and when BDC actually occurs. If a speaker has to pay their own airfare and accommodations and receive nothing in return for their efforts then they might be easily dissuaded to spend their time and money elsewhere.
Back in 2003, when I was to speak for BorCon, I actually lost my job during the process between submitting abstracts and attending BorCon. I also had a new baby on the way that was taking priority for my money. If it were not for the fact Borland was paying my airfare and accommodations I may not have been able to attend. I was lucky that my new employer gave me time off, although it was without pay. Since my speaking was not to promote my business (like many trainers, writers, consultants, etc.) I actually still spent more then I was compensated to attend. Granted I did get the benefit of actually attending.
I could easily see a large number of missing speakers in the uncompressed category. It could even be an honest mistake of waiting too long to make their reservations only to find out their only option is driving crossed country (or further) and sleeping in their car.
I decided I am planning to submit abstracts this year, but I am not planning to submit as many as in previous years. In previous years it was kind of like winning a lottery to be selected. You were compensated for your efforts. Now your efforts are rewarded with more work. Even submitting good quality abstracts is a massive undertaking. Actually preparing sessions is even more work.
No comments:
Post a Comment